memcg: stop using css id

Now memcg uses cgroup id instead of css id. Update some comments and
set mem_cgroup_subsys->use_id to 0.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index c14039575608201163f5490669ce5ff85b944296..65a46eff5c3dd3932deb8c70595d64b1ea388089 100644 (file)
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -582,16 +582,11 @@ static void disarm_sock_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
 /*
  * This will be the memcg's index in each cache's ->memcg_params->memcg_caches.
- * There are two main reasons for not using the css_id for this:
- *  1) this works better in sparse environments, where we have a lot of memcgs,
- *     but only a few kmem-limited. Or also, if we have, for instance, 200
- *     memcgs, and none but the 200th is kmem-limited, we'd have to have a
- *     200 entry array for that.
- *
- *  2) In order not to violate the cgroup API, we would like to do all memory
- *     allocation in ->create(). At that point, we haven't yet allocated the
- *     css_id. Having a separate index prevents us from messing with the cgroup
- *     core for this
+ * The main reason for not using cgroup id for this:
+ *  this works better in sparse environments, where we have a lot of memcgs,
+ *  but only a few kmem-limited. Or also, if we have, for instance, 200
+ *  memcgs, and none but the 200th is kmem-limited, we'd have to have a
+ *  200 entry array for that.
  *
  * The current size of the caches array is stored in
  * memcg_limited_groups_array_size.  It will double each time we have to
@@ -606,14 +601,14 @@ int memcg_limited_groups_array_size;
  * cgroups is a reasonable guess. In the future, it could be a parameter or
  * tunable, but that is strictly not necessary.
  *
- * MAX_SIZE should be as large as the number of css_ids. Ideally, we could get
+ * MAX_SIZE should be as large as the number of cgrp_ids. Ideally, we could get
  * this constant directly from cgroup, but it is understandable that this is
  * better kept as an internal representation in cgroup.c. In any case, the
- * css_id space is not getting any smaller, and we don't have to necessarily
+ * cgrp_id space is not getting any smaller, and we don't have to necessarily
  * increase ours as well if it increases.
  */
 #define MEMCG_CACHES_MIN_SIZE 4
-#define MEMCG_CACHES_MAX_SIZE 65535
+#define MEMCG_CACHES_MAX_SIZE MEM_CGROUP_ID_MAX
 
 /*
  * A lot of the calls to the cache allocation functions are expected to be
@@ -5984,8 +5979,6 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_free(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
        int node;
        size_t size = memcg_size();
 
-       free_css_id(&mem_cgroup_subsys, &memcg->css);
-
        for_each_node(node)
                free_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(memcg, node);
 
@@ -6766,7 +6759,6 @@ struct cgroup_subsys mem_cgroup_subsys = {
        .bind = mem_cgroup_bind,
        .base_cftypes = mem_cgroup_files,
        .early_init = 0,
-       .use_id = 1,
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_SWAP