Describe 550 better.

svn path=/trunk/; revision=3697

diff --git a/fetchmail.c b/fetchmail.c
index aa078140bc9be9a3c2c20bbe2f2d195951caccef..b01787db184b6e2edb8477944f2ae2a9842ab10f 100644 (file)
--- a/fetchmail.c
+++ b/fetchmail.c
@@ -896,8 +896,8 @@ static int load_params(int argc, char **argv, int optind)
     def_opts.smtpname = (char *)0;
 #define ANTISPAM(n)    save_str(&def_opts.antispam, STRING_DUMMY, 0)->val.status.num = (n)
     ANTISPAM(571);     /* sendmail */
-    ANTISPAM(550);     /* old exim */
-    ANTISPAM(501);     /* new exim */
+    ANTISPAM(550);     /* RFC2821 */
+    ANTISPAM(501);     /* old exim */
     ANTISPAM(554);     /* Postfix */
 #undef ANTISPAM
 

diff --git a/fetchmail.man b/fetchmail.man
index 83ce7a4e28ec982f00f8585ea88c1ed2129ce85e..ff8b44c70a35780b25a94421e07ae80bd88d70ac 100644 (file)
--- a/fetchmail.man
+++ b/fetchmail.man
@@ -1094,15 +1094,14 @@ Newer versions of
 return an error code of 571.  This return value
 is blessed by RFC1893 as "Delivery not authorized, message refused".
 .PP
-According to current drafts of the replacement for RFC821, the correct
-thing to return in this situation is 550 "Requested action not taken:
-mailbox unavailable" (the draft adds "[E.g., mailbox not found, no
-access, or command rejected for policy reasons].").
+According to RFC2821, the correct thing to return in this situation is
+550 "Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable" (the draft adds
+"[E.g., mailbox not found, no access, or command rejected for policy
+reasons].").
 .PP
-The
+Older versions of the
 .I exim
-MTA returns 501 "Syntax error in parameters or arguments", but will
-move to 550 soon.
+MTA return 501 "Syntax error in parameters or arguments".
 .PP
 The
 .I postfix