X-Git-Url: http://pileus.org/git/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=mm%2Fvmscan.c;h=828530e2794a352055eecdcaaff1db79aaafdd3c;hb=7f2de8171ddf28fdb2ca7f9a683ee1207849f718;hp=157bb116dec883f7a5075b2078f83a7022080820;hpb=50851c6248e1a13c45d97c41f6ebcf716093aa5e;p=~andy%2Flinux

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 157bb116dec..828530e2794 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1177,7 +1177,11 @@ int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page)
 }
 
 /*
- * Are there way too many processes in the direct reclaim path already?
+ * A direct reclaimer may isolate SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages from the LRU list and
+ * then get resheduled. When there are massive number of tasks doing page
+ * allocation, such sleeping direct reclaimers may keep piling up on each CPU,
+ * the LRU list will go small and be scanned faster than necessary, leading to
+ * unnecessary swapping, thrashing and OOM.
  */
 static int too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone, int file,
 		struct scan_control *sc)
@@ -1198,6 +1202,14 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone, int file,
 		isolated = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * GFP_NOIO/GFP_NOFS callers are allowed to isolate more pages, so they
+	 * won't get blocked by normal direct-reclaimers, forming a circular
+	 * deadlock.
+	 */
+	if ((sc->gfp_mask & GFP_IOFS) == GFP_IOFS)
+		inactive >>= 3;
+
 	return isolated > inactive;
 }
 
@@ -3131,7 +3143,7 @@ static int __devinit cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 	int nid;
 
 	if (action == CPU_ONLINE || action == CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN) {
-		for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
+		for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {
 			pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
 			const struct cpumask *mask;
 
@@ -3187,7 +3199,7 @@ static int __init kswapd_init(void)
 	int nid;
 
 	swap_setup();
-	for_each_node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY)
+	for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY)
  		kswapd_run(nid);
 	hotcpu_notifier(cpu_callback, 0);
 	return 0;