X-Git-Url: http://pileus.org/git/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=arch%2Fx86%2Fkernel%2Fhpet.c;h=aff0b3c2750929aff9f36ccf946f4a7ae31b1afa;hb=2c518959f082c549d6c6dd9b5380aec40c3eb07f;hp=7494999141b3ae9c9ab67302481a2e6c15e969e6;hpb=1053e6bba091d9d18797f7789df6a7ef8735f20c;p=~andy%2Flinux diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c index 7494999141b..aff0b3c2750 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c @@ -380,44 +380,35 @@ static int hpet_next_event(unsigned long delta, struct clock_event_device *evt, int timer) { u32 cnt; + s32 res; cnt = hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER); cnt += (u32) delta; hpet_writel(cnt, HPET_Tn_CMP(timer)); /* - * We need to read back the CMP register on certain HPET - * implementations (ATI chipsets) which seem to delay the - * transfer of the compare register into the internal compare - * logic. With small deltas this might actually be too late as - * the counter could already be higher than the compare value - * at that point and we would wait for the next hpet interrupt - * forever. We found out that reading the CMP register back - * forces the transfer so we can rely on the comparison with - * the counter register below. If the read back from the - * compare register does not match the value we programmed - * then we might have a real hardware problem. We can not do - * much about it here, but at least alert the user/admin with - * a prominent warning. - * - * An erratum on some chipsets (ICH9,..), results in - * comparator read immediately following a write returning old - * value. Workaround for this is to read this value second - * time, when first read returns old value. - * - * In fact the write to the comparator register is delayed up - * to two HPET cycles so the workaround we tried to restrict - * the readback to those known to be borked ATI chipsets - * failed miserably. So we give up on optimizations forever - * and penalize all HPET incarnations unconditionally. + * HPETs are a complete disaster. The compare register is + * based on a equal comparison and neither provides a less + * than or equal functionality (which would require to take + * the wraparound into account) nor a simple count down event + * mode. Further the write to the comparator register is + * delayed internally up to two HPET clock cycles in certain + * chipsets (ATI, ICH9,10). We worked around that by reading + * back the compare register, but that required another + * workaround for ICH9,10 chips where the first readout after + * write can return the old stale value. We already have a + * minimum delta of 5us enforced, but a NMI or SMI hitting + * between the counter readout and the comparator write can + * move us behind that point easily. Now instead of reading + * the compare register back several times, we make the ETIME + * decision based on the following: Return ETIME if the + * counter value after the write is less than 8 HPET cycles + * away from the event or if the counter is already ahead of + * the event. */ - if (unlikely((u32)hpet_readl(HPET_Tn_CMP(timer)) != cnt)) { - if (hpet_readl(HPET_Tn_CMP(timer)) != cnt) - printk_once(KERN_WARNING - "hpet: compare register read back failed.\n"); - } + res = (s32)(cnt - hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER)); - return (s32)(hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER) - cnt) >= 0 ? -ETIME : 0; + return res < 8 ? -ETIME : 0; } static void hpet_legacy_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode, @@ -440,9 +431,9 @@ static int hpet_legacy_next_event(unsigned long delta, static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hpet_dev *, cpu_hpet_dev); static struct hpet_dev *hpet_devs; -void hpet_msi_unmask(unsigned int irq) +void hpet_msi_unmask(struct irq_data *data) { - struct hpet_dev *hdev = get_irq_data(irq); + struct hpet_dev *hdev = data->handler_data; unsigned int cfg; /* unmask it */ @@ -451,10 +442,10 @@ void hpet_msi_unmask(unsigned int irq) hpet_writel(cfg, HPET_Tn_CFG(hdev->num)); } -void hpet_msi_mask(unsigned int irq) +void hpet_msi_mask(struct irq_data *data) { + struct hpet_dev *hdev = data->handler_data; unsigned int cfg; - struct hpet_dev *hdev = get_irq_data(irq); /* mask it */ cfg = hpet_readl(HPET_Tn_CFG(hdev->num)); @@ -462,18 +453,14 @@ void hpet_msi_mask(unsigned int irq) hpet_writel(cfg, HPET_Tn_CFG(hdev->num)); } -void hpet_msi_write(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg) +void hpet_msi_write(struct hpet_dev *hdev, struct msi_msg *msg) { - struct hpet_dev *hdev = get_irq_data(irq); - hpet_writel(msg->data, HPET_Tn_ROUTE(hdev->num)); hpet_writel(msg->address_lo, HPET_Tn_ROUTE(hdev->num) + 4); } -void hpet_msi_read(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg) +void hpet_msi_read(struct hpet_dev *hdev, struct msi_msg *msg) { - struct hpet_dev *hdev = get_irq_data(irq); - msg->data = hpet_readl(HPET_Tn_ROUTE(hdev->num)); msg->address_lo = hpet_readl(HPET_Tn_ROUTE(hdev->num) + 4); msg->address_hi = 0;