static inline int sctp_cacc_skip_3_1_f(struct sctp_transport *transport,
int count_of_newacks)
{
- if (count_of_newacks < 2 && !transport->cacc.cacc_saw_newack)
+ if (count_of_newacks < 2 &&
+ (transport && !transport->cacc.cacc_saw_newack))
return 1;
return 0;
}
* 3) If the missing report count for TSN t is to be
* incremented according to [RFC2960] and
* [SCTP_STEWART-2002], and CHANGEOVER_ACTIVE is set,
- * then the sender MUST futher execute steps 3.1 and
+ * then the sender MUST further execute steps 3.1 and
* 3.2 to determine if the missing report count for
* TSN t SHOULD NOT be incremented.
*
* 3.3) If 3.1 and 3.2 do not dictate that the missing
* report count for t should not be incremented, then
- * the sender SOULD increment missing report count for
+ * the sender SHOULD increment missing report count for
* t (according to [RFC2960] and [SCTP_STEWART_2002]).
*/
static inline int sctp_cacc_skip(struct sctp_transport *primary,
/* If we are retransmitting, we should only
* send a single packet.
+ * Otherwise, try appending this chunk again.
*/
if (rtx_timeout || fast_rtx)
done = 1;
+ else
+ goto redo;
/* Bundle next chunk in the next round. */
break;
case SCTP_CID_ECN_CWR:
case SCTP_CID_ASCONF_ACK:
one_packet = 1;
- /* Fall throught */
+ /* Fall through */
case SCTP_CID_SACK:
case SCTP_CID_HEARTBEAT:
/* SFR-CACC may require us to skip marking
* this chunk as missing.
*/
- if (!transport || !sctp_cacc_skip(primary, transport,
- count_of_newacks, tsn)) {
+ if (!transport || !sctp_cacc_skip(primary,
+ chunk->transport,
+ count_of_newacks, tsn)) {
chunk->tsn_missing_report++;
SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK(