Fix a compilation screwup.

[~andy/fetchmail] / fetchmail-FAQ.html

diff --git a/fetchmail-FAQ.html b/fetchmail-FAQ.html
index 40a7475c1e90b45bb483f3821e8c39c08840b58c..4f66e801bdf3ead142f5269791e8cffa65e59dcc 100644 (file)
--- a/fetchmail-FAQ.html
+++ b/fetchmail-FAQ.html
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 <table width="100%" cellpadding=0><tr>
 <td width="30%">Back to <a href="index.html">Fetchmail Home Page</a>
 <td width="30%" align=center>To <a href="/~esr/sitemap.html">Site Map</a>
-<td width="30%" align=right>$Date: 1999/08/01 04:01:40 $
+<td width="30%" align=right>$Date: 1999/08/21 06:04:18 $
 </table>
 <HR>
 <H1>Frequently Asked Questions About Fetchmail</H1>
@@ -166,6 +166,10 @@ quality you can have.  Extensive peer review by a large,
 multi-platform user community has shown that fetchmail is as near
 bulletproof as the underlying protocols permit.<p>
 
+Fetchmail is licensed under the <a
+href="http://gnu.org//copyleft/gpl.html">GNU General Public
+License</a>.<p>
+
 If you found this FAQ in the distribution, see the README for fetchmail's
 full feature list.<p>
 
@@ -347,7 +351,7 @@ broken (see item <a href="#S2">S2</a>) and NT cannot handle the
 sustained load of a high-volume remote mail server.  Even Microsoft
 itself knows better than to try this; their own Hotmail service runs
 over Solaris!  For extended discussion, see John Kirch's excellent <a
-href="http://www.kirch.net/unix-nt.html">white paper</a> on Unix
+href="http://unix-vs-nt.org/kirch/">white paper</a> on Unix
 vs. NT performance.<P>
 
 You can find sources for IMAP software at <a
@@ -2453,7 +2457,7 @@ inactivity timeout.<p>
 <table width="100%" cellpadding=0><tr>
 <td width="30%">Back to <a href="index.html">Fetchmail Home Page</a>
 <td width="30%" align=center>To <a href="/~esr/sitemap.html">Site Map</a>
-<td width="30%" align=right>$Date: 1999/08/01 04:01:40 $
+<td width="30%" align=right>$Date: 1999/08/21 06:04:18 $
 </table>
 
 <P><ADDRESS>Eric S. Raymond <A HREF="mailto:esr@thyrsus.com">&lt;esr@snark.thyrsus.com&gt;</A></ADDRESS>